UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
March 4, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DONNA RENEE MOORE
USM No: 015811
Date of Previous Judgment: August 8, 2006 ) Tanzania Cannon-Eckerle
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) ) Defendant's Attorney
Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Upon motion of TM the defendant TM the Director of the Bureau of Prisons ' the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
' DENIED. TM GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of months is reduced to.
I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE(Prior to Any Departures)
Previous Offense Level: 29 Amended Offense Level: 27 Criminal History Category: II Criminal History Category: II Previous Guideline Range: 120 to 121 months Amended Guideline Range: 120 to 120 months
II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE
TM The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.
TM The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range.
' Other (explain): No reduction due to guidelines being based on mandatory minimum sentence of 120 months.
III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated August 8, 2006 shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Effective Date: March 4, 2010
(if different from order date)
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.