United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
ANNE M. TOMPKINS, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
STEVEN R. KAUFMAN, ESQ., Assistant United States Attorney, BIANCA GRAGG,
CHRIS FIALKO, ESQ., Attorney for Defendant.
CONSENT ORDER AND JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE PENDING RULE 32.2(c)(2)
ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge.
BASED UPON the Defendant's plea of guilty and finding that there is a nexus between the property listed below and the offense(s) to which the Defendant has pled guilty and that the Defendant (or any combination of Defendants in this case) has or had a possessory interest or other legal interest in the property, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The following property is forfeited to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), provided, however, that forfeiture of specific assets is subject to any and all third party petitions under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), pending final adjudication herein:
a. Approximately $169, 900 in United States currency seized on or about November 16, 2012;
b. Approximately $139, 925 in United States currency seized on or about November 20, 2012;
c. Approximately $986.22 seized from Bank of America account XXXX6852;
d. Approximately $32.77 seized from Bank of America account XXXX0766;
e. Approximately $3, 630.81 seized from Bank of America account XXXX4784;
f. Approximately $10, 000 seized from Bank of America account XXXX2484;
g. Approximately $6, 000 seized from Wells Fargo account XXXX8085; and,
h. The following real properties, provided that defendant shall first be permitted to attempt to sell these properties for a period of one year. For each property sold, the closing attorney shall remit the net proceeds from the sale to the United States, by check payable to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, until the total sum of $230, 000 has been remitted, at which time the $230, 000 shall be forfeited as a substitute res the real properties, the forfeiture shall be dismissed as to any remaining real ...