United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
On September 9, 2014, the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed (Doc. 3) and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff filed several documents in response. (Docs. 5, 6, and 7.)
The court has conducted a review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination. The court's review is in accord with the Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that to the extent Plaintiff's objections contain a motion to amend (see, e.g., Doc. 5 at 1), they are DENIED for the same reasons noted by the Magistrate Judge in the Recommendation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for being frivolous or malicious and for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, as well as for seeking monetary ...