Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Briley

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

October 22, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAY BONANZA BRILEY, Defendant - Appellant

Argued: September 19, 2014.

Petition for certiorari filed at, 01/20/2015

Page 268

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. (1:12-cr-00482-LO-1). Liam O'Grady, District Judge.

ARGUED:

Cara Viglucci Lopez, SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

David Sang Hak Lee, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

ON BRIEF:

Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Frances H. Pratt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Alexandria, Virginia; Gordon D. Todd, Sean R. Dickson, SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Judge Wilkinson wrote the opinion, in which Judge Duncan and Judge Keenan joined.

OPINION

Page 269

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Jay Bonanza Briley was convicted after a two-day jury trial on four counts arising from intimate sexual activities in a national park and an ensuing physical altercation with United States Park Police officers. Briley now challenges the interpretation of the statute under which he was convicted, 18 U.S.C. ยง 111. He also contests the admission of evidence ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.