Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Van Dyke v. Slusser

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

December 2, 2014

SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI, Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT T. SLUSSER, et al., Defendant(s)

ORDER

WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, Senior District Judge

On August 22, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 3 and 4.) Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation. Plaintiff also filed five Amended Complaints (Docs. 6-10).

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, correcting the defects set out in the Order and Recommendation. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 6) was filed as of right, but suffers from the same defects as the original complaint, and that Plaintiff did not receive leave of court to file the remainder of the Amended Complaints (Docs. 7-10). The Amended Complaints are therefore dismissed.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.