Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hamby v. Brock and Scott, PLLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina, Southern Division

January 29, 2015

JAMES HAMBY, Plaintiff,
v.
BROCK AND SCOTT, PLLC, Defendant.

ORDER

JAMES C. DEVER III Chief United States District Judge

On December 15, 2014, Brock & Scott, PLLC ("defendant") filed a motion to dismiss [D.E. 8] and a supporting memorandum [D.E. 9]. The court notified James Hamby ("Hamby") about the motion to dismiss, the consequences of failing to respond, and the response deadline [D.E. 13]. See Roseboro v. Garrison. 528 F.2d 309, 310 (4th Cir. 1975) (per curiam). Hamby did not respond.

Hamby's complaint does not meet the pleading standards in Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See, e.g., Mallory v. Atkinson. 330 F.App'x 41, 42 (4th Cir. 2009) (per curiam) (unpublished); Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank. N.A.. No. 5:13-CV-785-D, 2014 WL 5471911, at *2 (E.D. N.C. Oct. 22, 2014) (unpublished); Salley v. Bank of Am.. N.A.. No. 5:13-CV-753-D, 2014 WL 2768660, at *2-3 (E.D. N.C. June 18, 2014) (unpublished). Alternatively, Hamby fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6); see, e.g., Bryant v. Wells Fargo Bank. N.A.. 861 ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.