Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Huger v. Anderson

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

April 27, 2015

SHELDON L. HUGER, Plaintiff,
v.
OFFICER M.D. ANDERSON, Defendant.

ORDER

LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge.

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on April 2, 2015, was served on the parties in this action. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by § 636.[1]

In conducting a review of the Recommendation, the Court has identified a scrivener's error: where the Recommendation states that, "The record before the Court thus suggests that Defendant did not sustain substantial injuries, " (Doc. 31 at 9 (emphasis added)), it should instead refer to Plaintiff. The Court, however, has determined that said scrivener's error does not alter the substance of the Recommendation.

The Court hereby adopts, except as to the scrivener's error outlined herein, the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25) is GRANTED. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.