Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Graham

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Asheville Division

July 8, 2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
JOHN TRAMPUS GRAHAM, Defendant.

ORDER

DENNIS L. HOWELL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

THIS CAUSE coming on to be heard before the undersigned upon a Violation Report (#58) filed by the United States Probation Office on June 30, 2015 alleging that Defendant had violated terms and conditions of his pretrial release. At the call of this matter on for hearing it appeared that Defendant was present with his counsel, Derrick R. Bailey, and the Government was present through Assistant United States Attorney, Tom Ascik. From the evidence offered and from the statements of the Assistant United States Attorney and the attorney for the Defendant, and the records in this cause, the Court makes the following findings.

Findings:

At the call of this matter, Defendant, by and through his attorney, denied the allegations contained in the Violation Report. The Government introduced, without objection, the Violation Report into evidence. Testimony was then presented by the Government through Mark Corbin, United States Probation Officer.

The Defendant was charged in a bill of indictment(#1) with conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, and four counts of possession of Pseudoephedrine, having reasonable cause to believe that Pseudoephedrine would be used to manufacture methamphetamine. On June 8, 2015, an initial appearance hearing was held for Defendant. At that time, it was recommended by the Government that Defendant be released on an unsecured bond. The undersigned then entered an Order(#15) releasing Defendant on a $25, 000 unsecured bond and further set conditions of release which included the following:

(8)(s) The defendant shall participate in one of the following location monitoring program components and abide by its requirements as the pretrial services officer or supervising officer instructs.
(ii) Home Detention. You are restricted to your residence at all times except for employment; education; religious services; medical, substance abuse, or mental health treatment; attorney visits; court appearances; court-ordered obligations; or other activities pre-approved by the pretrial services office or supervising officer. (#15)

Defendant was allowed to be immediately released but was instructed to return to the United States Probation Office so the monitoring equipment could be installed. Defendant did not return as he was supposed to do and a Violation Report (#40) was filed on June 15, 2015. The undersigned scheduled a hearing in regard to the Violation Report. After the hearing Defendant was released on further terms and conditions of pretrial release. (#49, 52)

It is now alleged in a Violation Report(#58) that Defendant has again violated terms and conditions of his pretrial release by leaving his residence on Saturday, June 27, 2015 from 2:55 p.m. to 5:36 p.m. without first obtaining permission and further by leaving his residence on Sunday morning, June 28, 2015 at approximately 1:19 a.m. and then returning two hours later at 3:19 a.m. (#58) In testimony presented through Officer Corbin, he testified he received email messages from the company that operates the monitoring equipment on Saturday afternoon, June 27, 2015. He then went to Defendant’s residence in Murphy, NC and later located Defendant some hours later. Defendant’s mother advised that she had taken Defendant to the “store.” Early the next morning at approximately 1:19 a.m. Officer Corbin was again advised that Defendant had left his residence for a period of two hours. When Officer Corbin confronted Defendant concerning this issue, Defendant advised he had been to get his “medicine.” Defendant declined to tell Officer Corbin where he had been or where his medicine had been located.

Discussion.

18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(1) provides as follows: The judicial officer shall enter an order of revocation and detention if, after a hearing, the judicial officer -----

(1) finds that there is----
(A) probable cause to believe that the person has committed a Federal, State, or local ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.