Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Blunt v. Belk, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

February 6, 2017

BRIANA BLUNT, as an individual and as a representative of the class, Plaintiff,
v.
BELK, INC., Defendant.

          INITIAL PRETRIAL ORDER

          Graham C. Mullen United States District Judge

         IN ACCORDANCE WITH the Local Rules of the Western District of North Carolina and pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned enters the following Initial Pretrial Order in this matter.

         A. DISCOVERY GUIDELINES: Discovery shall be proportional to the needs of the case and is limited as follows:

Pre-Discovery Disclosures: The information required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) has been exchanged by each party.
This is a putative nationwide class action where Defendant will bear the brunt of discovery. The parties' attorneys are familiar with each other from prior class litigation involving the same claims. The parties have agreed to meaningfully meet and confer to sequence discovery in a logical manner to avoid duplication of effort and ensure proportionality at each stage of the proceedings, and to surface issues with the Court only as needed and if informal efforts to reach compromise fail. Defendant reserves its right to seek a stay of some or all discovery pending resolution of any appropriate dispositive motions.
As ordered by the Court, discovery will be bifurcated. First, discovery will initially be limited to that needed for class certification (hereinafter referred to as “Class Certification Discovery”). Then, if necessary, a period of discovery on the merits of the underlying claims (hereinafter referred to as “Merits Discovery”) will follow. Merits Discovery should not commence until after the Court rules on Plaintiff's anticipated motion for class certification. The parties agree that only after the Court rules on the class certification, and the precise parameters of this litigation are defined, should they engage in Merits Discovery. After the Court issues a ruling on the class certification issue, the parties will to meet and prepare an updated Certification and Report of Initial Attorneys' Conference which will outline the appropriate Merits Discovery for the case either as a class certification or an individual plaintiff's case.
Discovery Limits: Each party may propound no more than 25 interrogatories, including subparts; no more than 25 requests for admission, including subparts, exclusive of requests to admit the authenticity of documents, which shall be unlimited; and take no more than 6 depositions of fact witnesses without prior approval of the court.
Defendant reserves the right to seek a limitation on the number of hours of deposition Plaintiff may take depending upon the results of their “meet and confer” over the scope of Plaintiff's “person most knowledgeable” deposition notice. Notwithstanding the bifurcation of discovery, Defendant will take Plaintiff's deposition only once, and shall not be deposed a second time absent a specific showing of need from Defendant. If an issue arises after Plaintiff's deposition that warrants additional exploration from Defendant, the parties will confer with the Court regarding same.

         Reports from retained experts under Rule 26(a)(2) will be due:

from plaintiff(s) by 45 days prior to filing motion for class certification; and
from defendant(s) by 30 days after plaintiff submits expert report.
The court reserves the right to shift the costs of production of discovery to the party requesting it when the court determines that the request is not proportionate. Whenever a party has an objection to production, the objection must be specific. Production of documents may be accomplished through production of hard copies instead of electronic data.

         B. RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION: Every response to an interrogatory or request for admission, and every objection thereto, shall be preceded by the original number and complete text of the corresponding interrogatory or request for admission.

         C. THE MAINTENANCE OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS: Discovery materials are NOT to be filed. All counsel are advised to consult the local rule which provides that while depositions, interrogatories, and requests for admission, and responses thereto, must still be served on all parties, they are no longer to be filed unless upon order of the Court. The ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.