Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Peraino v. Z Technologies Corp.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

June 1, 2017

CARL A. PERAINO, Plaintiff,
v.
Z TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Defendant.

          Todd J. Combs, N.C., Combs Law, PLLC, Attorney for Plaintiff.

          Stacy K. Wood, N.C., Sarah J. Douglas, N.C., Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein, LLP, Attorneys for Defendant

          CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER

          Graham C. Mullen United States District Judge.

         Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, upon motion by the parties, with the consent of the parties, and it appearing that the discovery process in this action may involve the production of information that a party may contend is confidential and/or proprietary and that good cause exists for the entry of an Order limiting the disclosure of such information;

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

         1. "Confidential Information" as used herein means all personnel related records of individuals who are not parties to this case, all proprietary, financial, business or other commercially sensitive information, personal financial information or medical information of Plaintiff, whether documentary or otherwise, designated as "confidential" and delivered, produced or disclosed by any party in this action in response to an interrogatory, a request for production of documents, a deposition question or otherwise, or delivered, produced or disclosed by any third party in response to a subpoena, deposition question or otherwise. The designation of documents or information as “Confidential Information” shall not be conclusive for purposes of the substantive issues in this case.

         2. All documents produced or information provided or disclosed by any party or third party in discovery in this action as identified in paragraph 1 shall be treated as confidential and the use or disclosure of such documents or information shall be governed by the terms of this Protective Order, provided that the party producing or otherwise disclosing such documents or information designates such documents or information as “confidential” at the time of production or disclosure or as otherwise provided herein.

         3. Confidential Information, including copies or summaries thereof, shall be used only for the prosecution or defense of this action (including, but not limited to, any mediation, arbitration, or other settlement process, as well as appeals of this action) and shall not be used or employed for any other purpose whatsoever. Confidential Information shall not be disclosed or made available to anyone except:

a. the Court;
b. the parties to this action and officers, directors or employees of the parties who are actively participating in the prosecution or defense of this action;
c. counsel for the parties to this action and employees of said counsel;
d. experts or consultants specifically retained by the parties or their attorneys to assist them in the preparation of this case or to serve as expert witnesses at the trial of this action;
e. third-party witnesses or potential witnesses whom counsel reasonably deem necessary for the preparation and trial of this action; f. court reporters engaged to record depositions, hearings or trials in this action; and g. mediators ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.