Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Barideaux v. Gorrod

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

August 8, 2017

JERAMIE BARIDEAUX JONATHAN HARRIS, Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN C. GORROD MICHAEL R. BODENSTEIN MICHAEL C. WALLIN, Defendant.

          ORDER

          GRAHAM C. MULLEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant John Gorrod's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26), Defendant Michael Wallin's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27), Defendant Michael Bodenstein's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 30), Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition (Doc. No. 40), and Defendants filed a joint Reply brief (Doc. No. 42).

         I. BACKGROUND

         This case arises from an encounter between Charlotte Mecklenburg Police officers (“CMPD”) and the Plaintiffs in the parking lot of the Rodeway Inn motel located at 3601 Brookshire Blvd in Charlotte. On April 14, 2015, at roughly 10:30 p.m., Mr. Barideaux and Mr. Harris arrived at the Rodeway Inn located on Brookshire Boulevard. Once parked, Mr. Darryl Moffett entered the vehicle to let Mr. Barideaux and Mr. Harris listen and talk about music tracks.

         This location was previously operated as the Brookshire Inn and was the subject of a Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction entered on February 28, 2011 by the Superior Court of Mecklenburg County, which found that the property at 3601 Brookshire Boulevard had been maintained and used for the purpose of nuisance activities, including repeated acts of violence, prostitution, and acts of illegal possession and sale of controlled substances by its customers. The effect of the Consent Judgment was to perpetually enjoin the then-owner of the property “and all other persons” from maintaining a public nuisance on the property.

         The injunction included the implementation of a plan of nuisance abatement which included, among other things employing an armed security officer. But, at the time of this incident, the owner of the Rodeway Inn did not employ an armed security guard and allowed CMPD officers regular access to the property and officers patrolled the property at least three times each day. The Rodeway Inn also maintained conspicuous signage stating that individuals not registered with the motel were not allowed on the property.

         As he performed his zone check at the Rodeway Inn, Officer Wallin observed a dark colored Toyota Camry in the rear parking lot that was backed into a parking space with the lights on and the engine running. He drove past the vehicle and observed three occupants. Officer Wallin parked next to the Camry on the vehicle's passenger side and got out of his marked police car.

         Prior to and as he was approaching the driver's side of the car, he testified that he noticed the three occupants making movements in the car and their hands going towards the floorboards and sides. Officer Wallin testified that he smelled the odor of marijuana as he approached the vehicle. He walked around the vehicle and approached the driver's side front window to talk with the occupants. With the window down, Officer Wallin testified that he could tell that the odor of marijuana was coming from inside the car. Plaintiff Jeramie Barideaux was the driver of the Camry, Plaintiff Jonathan Harris was the front seat passenger and Darryl Moffett was in the rear driver's side passenger seat.

         Officer Wallin asked the driver for his license and registration and asked the occupants for their licenses. While at the driver's window, Officer Wallin requested backup at the scene because of the odor of marijuana and because he was a single officer with three vehicle occupants.

         Officer Bodenstein heard the radio transmission from Officer Wallin requesting that another unit assist him at the Rodeway Inn with an “occupied suspicious vehicle” and responded to the request for assistance. As Officer Bodenstein arrived, Officer Wallin walked back to his car to run the licenses and check for outstanding warrants. He found that Mr. Moffett has several warrants for his arrest. Sergeant Gorrod arrived at the scene soon after Officer Bodenstein. Sergeant Gorrod and Officer Bodenstein both testified that they smelled marijuana when they approached the car.

         Officer Wallin approached Mr. Barideaux and asked him to step out of the vehicle so he could speak with him. Once he stepped out of the vehicle, Officer Wallin asked Mr. Barideaux if he had anything in the car such as drugs, knives, or guns. Mr. Barideaux said he did not. Officer Wallin asked Mr. Barideaux for his consent to the search his vehicle. Mr. Barideaux said there was nothing in the car and did not consent to the search. Officer Wallin then told Mr. Barideaux that because he smelled the odor of marijuana, he had probable cause to search the vehicle. Mr. Barideaux then put his hands up and allowed Officer Wallin to search his person. Officer Wallin did not find anything in the search of Mr. Barideaux.

         Next, Officer Wallin walked to the front passenger side where Mr. Harris was seated in the vehicle and where Officer Bodenstein was standing. He asked Officer Bodenstein whether he smelled anything and Officer Bodenstein responded in the affirmative. Officer Wallin asked Mr. Harris to step out of the vehicle and asked Mr. Harris if he had anything on him. Mr. Harris said that he had a knife and raised his hands. Officer Wallin removed the knife and placed it on the hood of the vehicle and then he conducted a person search of Mr. Harris just like he conducted on Mr. Barideaux. Officer Wallin did not find anything else on Mr. Harris.

         During his search of Mr. Harris, Officer Wallin saw that Sergeant Gorrod had placed marijuana on the roof the car. Officer Wallin learned that Mr. Moffett gave a baggie containing approximately seven (7) grams of marijuana to Sergeant Gorrod. Officer Wallin got Mr. Moffett out of the vehicle and searched him, finding a small baggie with a white powdered substance. Mr. Moffett told the officers that the bag's content was Molly (i.e. methylenedioxymethamphetamine). Officer Wallin placed Mr. Moffett in handcuffs while he completed the search. Officer Wallin then placed Mr. Moffett in the back seat of his patrol vehicle and activated his digital mobile video recording (“DMVR”).

         Officer Wallin returned to the Plaintiffs' vehicle and started searching it, starting in the back seat where Mr. Moffett was sitting. Officer Wallin found a small digital scale in between the seats on a little hump between the floor boards and found marijuana that had been broken up all over the floorboard. After searching the vehicle, Officer Wallin talked to Mr. Moffett. The DMVR audio from Officer Wallin's vehicle shows that after Mr. Moffett was advised of his rights, he acknowledged that he had the marijuana in a ball; that he began breaking it up when Officer Wallin arrived; and that's why there was marijuana on the floor of the car. (Wallin DMVR, 23:27:04-23:27:19, 23:36:20). Mr. Moffett also acknowledged that the scale and Molly were his, and that he had given Officer Wallin the wrong name when he was asked for his identification. Id.

         At this point, after the drugs and scale were discovered, Mr. Barideaux and Mr. Harris were standing in front of Officer Bodenstein's vehicle. Officer Wallin asked Officer Bodenstein and Sergeant Gorrod to conduct secondary searches of Mr. Barideaux and Mr. Harris.

         Officer Bodenstein searched Mr. Harris and Sergeant Gorrod searched Mr. Barideaux. This search included a search of Mr. Harris' groin area. Officer Bodenstein noticed during his search that Harris was clenching his buttocks. He reported to Officer Wallin that Mr. Harris appeared to be clenching his buttocks as if trying to conceal something. Mr. Harris stated that he does not do drugs and wouldn't hide anything in his buttocks. No illegal items were found during this search.

         Then, Officers Bodenstein and Wallin discussed doing a visual body cavity search of Mr. Harris to determine if he was hiding narcotics in his buttocks. Sergeant Gorrod, acting as the supervisor, approved the decision to conduct the visual body cavity search of Mr. Harris. Officer Wallin told Mr. Harris that the officers wanted to conduct a visual body cavity search of him in the privacy of one of the motel rooms. He told Mr. Harris that the cavity search would be conducted either in the motel room or downtown. Mr. Harris in response stated “you're not going to find nothing. Okay, let's go.” Officer Wallin asked Britney Gibert, who had been staying at the Rodeway Inn with Mr. Moffett, whether she would allow them to use room 119 for the further search of Mr. Harris. Ms. Gibert handed the key to Officer Wallin, who used the key to access her hotel room to conduct the visual body cavity search of Mr. Harris.

         While in the bathroom, Harris lowered his pants and underpants, bent over at the waist and spread his buttocks apart. Neither Officer Wallin nor Officer Bodenstein touched Mr. Harris and no contraband was found. The search lasted two minutes or less. They walked back outside and Officer Wallin asked Mr. Harris and Mr. Barideaux for their drivers licenses again so he could write down their information. Officer Wallin returned their licenses and told them they could leave.

         Plaintiffs have filed fourteen claims in connection to the searches of their person by Officer Wallin, Officer Bodenstein, and Sergeant Gorrod (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the defendant officers”) on the evening of April 14, 2015. Plaintiffs have put forth five claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and seven tort claims under North Carolina law against the defendant officers, including intentional infliction of emotional distress, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.