Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Span

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina

March 7, 2018

Gary Vincent Span

          Assistant U.S. Attorney: Elizabeth Greene

          Defense Attorney: Erin Kimberly Taylor

          Honorable Max O. Cogburn, Jr., U.S. District Court Judge

          PETITION FOR WARRANT FOR OFFENDER UNDER SUPERVISION

          David S. Cayer, United States Magistrate Judge

         PETITIONING THE COURT

         [X] To issue a warrant

         [ ] To issue a summons

         BOND RECOMMENDATION: Detention.

         The probation officer believes that the offender has violated the following condition(s) of supervision:

         Violation Number Nature of Noncompliance

         1. DRUG/ALCOHOL USE (Date violation concluded: 11/13/2017).

         The defendant has violated the condition of supervision that states, " The defendant shall refrain from excessive use of alcohol and shall not unlawfully purchase, possess, use, distribute or administer any narcotic or other controlled substance, or any paraphernalia related to such substances, except as duly prescribed by a licensed physician, " in that, the defendant admitted to using marijuana on, or about, 07/25/2015 and again on 11/13/2017. (Grade C Violation)

         2. NEW LAW VIOLATION (Date violation concluded: 12/7/2017).

         The defendant has violated the condition of supervision that states, "The defendant shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime, " In that on 12/07/2017, based on investigative reports by Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department (CMPD), the defendant possessed and distributed approximately six (6) grams of heroin. If charged federally this would constitute a violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1). (Grade A Violation)

         3. NEW LAW VIOLATION (Date violation concluded: 12/13/2017).

         The defendant has violated the condition of supervision that states, "The defendant shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime, " In that on 12/13/2017, based on investigative reports by CMPD, the defendant possessed and distributed approximately six (6) grams of heroin. If charged federally this would constitute a violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1). (Grade A Violation)

         4. NEW LAW VIOLATION (Date violation concluded: 12/20/2017).

         The defendant has violated the condition of supervision that states, "The defendant shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime, ” in that on 12/20/2017, based on investigative reports by CMPD, the defendant possessed and distributed approximately twenty-nine (29) grams of heroin. If charged federally this would constitute a violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1). (Grade A Violation)

         5. NEW LAW VIOLATION (Date violation concluded: 12/20/2017).

         The defendant has violated the condition of supervision that states, "The defendant shall not commit another federal, state, or local crime, " in that on 12/20/2017, based on investigative reports by CMPD, the defendant directed officers to the location of approximately 14.6 grams of heroin in his mother's residence. If charged federally, this would constitute a violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1). (Grade A Violation)

         6. NEW LAW VIOLATION (Date violation ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.