Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Randall v. Gaston Community Action, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

May 28, 2019

SHEILA RANDALL, Plaintiff,
v.
GASTON COMMUNITY ACTION INC., JOSEPH W. DIXON, CAROL KILGO and TRAVICE CONNER, Defendants.

          Jennifer Diane Spyker, Maloney Law Associates, PLLC Attorney for Plaintiff

          Gerald L. Liska Mullen Holland & Cooper P.A. Attorney for Defendants

          CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER

          David S. Cayer, United States Magistrate Judge

         Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and upon agreement of counsel, and deeming it just and proper to do so, the Court enters the following ORDER:

         1. Counsel for any party may designate any document or information contained in a document as confidential if counsel determines, in good faith, that such designation is necessary to protect the interests of the client. Information and documents designated by a party as confidential will be labeled “CONFIDENTIAL.” “Confidential” information or documents may be referred to collectively as “confidential information.”

         2. “Confidential information, ” as used herein includes, but is not necessarily limited to:

a. Defendants' personnel records, Plaintiff's personnel records, as well as the personnel records of other, similarly situated employees.
b. The names of minor children who were students at Defendants' school;
b. All financial or other sensitive information, which is not generally accessible to the public, is entitled to an expectation of privacy, and is otherwise treated by a party as confidential;
c. Any documents, records or information which relate to any medical treatment of Plaintiff;

         3. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, or otherwise provided for herein, the confidential information disclosed will be held and used by the person receiving such information solely for use in connection with the above-captioned action.

         4. In the event a party challenges another party's confidential designation, counsel shall make a good faith effort to resolve the dispute, and in the absence of a resolution, the challenging party may thereafter seek resolution by the Court. Nothing in this Protective Order constitutes an admission by any party that confidential information disclosed in this case is relevant or admissible.

         5. Each party specifically reserves the right to object to the use or admissibility of all confidential information disclosed, in accordance with applicable law.

         6. Information or documents designated as “Confidential” shall not be ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.