Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ollila v. Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

December 19, 2019

ERIC OLLILA, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs,



         WHEREAS this matter came before the Court on the application of Lead Plaintiff for approval of the Settlement set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement between the Parties dated June 21, 2019 (“Stipulation”);

         WHEREAS, unless otherwise defined in this Judgment, the capitalized terms herein shall have the same meaning as they have in the Stipulation;

         WHEREAS, by Order dated August 12, 2019 (the “Preliminary Approval Order, ” as amended on August 30, 2019, ECF No. 79), this Court (a) preliminarily approved the Settlement; (b) ordered that notice of the proposed Settlement be provided to potential Settlement Class Members; (c) provided Settlement Class Members the opportunity to opt out of the Settlement Class or object to the proposed Settlement; and (d) scheduled a hearing regarding final approval of the Settlement;

         WHEREAS due and adequate notice of the Settlement was provided to the Settlement Class;

         WHEREAS, the Court conducted a hearing on December 16, 2019 (the “Settlement Fairness Hearing”) to consider, among other things, (a) whether the terms and conditions of the Settlement are fair, reasonable and adequate, and in the best interests of Lead Plaintiff and the other Settlement Class Members, and should therefore be approved; (b) whether the Settlement Class should be certified, and Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel appointed as Settlement Class Representative and Class Counsel, respectively; and (c) whether a judgment should be entered dismissing the Action with prejudice as against the Defendants; and

         WHEREAS the Court having reviewed and considered the Stipulation, all papers filed and proceedings held herein in connection with the Settlement, all oral and written comments received regarding the Settlement, and the record in the Action, and good cause appearing therefor;


         1. Jurisdiction.

         This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action, all matters relating to the Settlement, and over all Parties to the Action, including all Settlement Class Members.

         2. Final Approval of Class Notice and Class Certification.

         The Court hereby finds that the distribution of the Notice to all Settlement Class Members who could be identified through reasonable effort, and the publication of the Summary Notice as provided for in the Preliminarily Approval Order constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances of the matters set forth therein, and said notice fully satisfied the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78 et seq., as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Constitution of the United States (including the requirements of due process), and any other applicable law.

         3. Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court hereby grants final certification of the Settlement Class consisting of all persons and entities who purchased B&W publicly-traded common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), on other U.S. exchanges or in a U.S. transaction, or who purchased B&W stock on the NYSE on a “when issued” basis during the period from June 17, 2015 through August 9, 2017, inclusive (the “Settlement Class”). Excluded from the Settlement Class are: (i) Defendants; (ii) members of the Immediate Family of any Defendant who is an individual; (iii) any person who was an officer or director of B&W during the Class Period; (iv) any firm, trust, corporation, or other entity in which any Defendant has or had a controlling interest; (v) B&W's employee retirement and benefit plan(s) and their participants or beneficiaries, to the extent they made purchases through such plan(s); and (vi) the legal representatives, affiliates, heirs, successors-in-interest, or assigns of any such excluded person. Also excluded from the Settlement Class are those persons who have timely and validly requested exclusion from the Settlement Class pursuant to the Notice sent to potential Settlement Class Members. A list of such persons and entities who filed timely, completed, and valid requests for exclusion from the Settlement Class is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

         4. With respect to the Settlement Class, the Court finds that, for purposes of effectuating the Settlement, the prerequisites for a class action under Rules 23(a) and (b)(3) have been satisfied. The members of the Settlement Class are so numerous that joinder of all Settlement Class Members in the class action is impracticable and there are questions of law and fact common to the Settlement Class which predominate over any individual questions. The claims of Lead Plaintiff are typical of the claims of the Settlement Class and Lead Plaintiff and its counsel have fairly and adequately represented and protected the interests of all of the Settlement Class Members. A class action is also superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy, considering: (a) the interests of the members of the Settlement Class in individually controlling the prosecution of the separate actions; (b) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.